Mindware Multi-Client Development Project | Building a Self-Organizing Operational World Model
Mindware Multi-Client Development Project — Draft
Phase 1 Development Plan (Draft)

Enterprise adoption of AI agents will soon face a fundamental obstacle: LLMs cannot persistently retain company-specific knowledge, experience, and decision histories in a verifiable form. Larger context windows do not solve this problem. In the post-AI-bubble era, the central development challenge will shift toward building Operational World Models.

Mindware Multi-Client Development Project

Phase 1 Development Plan (Draft)

Building on LLM Wiki and Concept Index

Building a Self-Organizing Operational World Model
through Organizational Knowledge Mining

Core Development Outcome: Integrated Organizational Knowledge Mining, Episodic Memory, and Process Mining

Phase 1: October 1, 2026 – September 30, 2027

Organizer: Mindware Research Institute, Inc.

Operational Information
Knowledge Mining
Operational World Model
What This Project Will Develop

The system will ingest information scattered across internal documents, relational databases, operational logs, reports, and other sources; extract candidate elements with LLMs; support human validation; form concepts through ConceptMiner and Concept Index; and structure the results as Episode Cards and process models. The outcome will be an enterprise-governed Operational World Model shared by human users and AI agents.

Intended Participants
Executives and practitioners responsible for AI/DX, information systems, R&D, corporate planning, new business, and knowledge management across manufacturing, distribution, retail, telecommunications, IT, finance, food and beverage, and other industries
Participation Fee
JPY 2.5 million per unit, excluding tax / up to two designated participants per unit
Payment Terms
50% upon application and contract execution; 50% before the project begins
Participation Format
Multiple units permitted; company and participant names confidential in principle
Launch Condition
No minimum number of companies; the project will proceed from one participant
Initial Expansion Target
20 companies; additional development, external specialists, and evaluation environments will expand with participation
01

Project Overview

This is a one-year, multi-client development program in which participating companies jointly support the creation of a common software foundation that transforms documents, data, logs, conversation records, and decision histories scattered across an organization into reusable knowledge, experience, and process assets. The primary objective is not company-specific research or consulting, but the establishment of a reusable product foundation applicable across multiple organizations.

Company-specific knowledge does not persist

Chat histories and summaries do not become governed enterprise assets with source traceability, change history, access control, and outcome evaluation.

RAG alone cannot model operational reality

Document retrieval cannot by itself represent who made what decision, under which circumstances, with what outcome, or how work proceeds through sequences and branches.

Analytical outputs are not operational artifacts

Clusters and process maps are not enough. The system must produce manuals, case collections, decision rationales, and improvement candidates that business users can continue to use.

02

Development Objective: Building an Operational World Model through Organizational Knowledge Mining

The Operational World Model proposed here is not a massive model intended to simulate the world in general. It is an organization-specific model that continuously updates actors, objects, states, events, decisions, outcomes, relationships, and operating procedures with traceable sources.

Operational
World Model
Model how the organization actually operates from dispersed operational information
Rather than completing a fixed ontology in advance, the system forms concepts and structures from actual documents, data, and experience in a form that people can inspect and revise.
Input Information
Mining and Structuring
Operational Assets Created
Policies, manuals, reports, and meeting records
Knowledge-page compilation, question-pattern generation, and source reference through LLM Wiki
Searchable and reusable document knowledge
Relational databases, CSV files, and free-text data
Concept formation through embeddings, GNG + MST, and Concept Index
Concept nodes, similarity groups, and conceptual segments
Business systems and automation flows such as Zapier
Normalize events, decisions, and outcomes and record them as Episode Cards
Verifiable operational episodic memory
Time-sequenced events, work histories, and response histories
Event-log generation, process discovery, and analysis of deviations, repetitions, and handoffs
Process models based on actual operations
Human validation, evaluation, and correction
Manage sources, change histories, permissions, and approval status
A trustworthy knowledge foundation governed by the enterprise
03

Core Development Outcomes of Phase 1

Phase 1 will connect the following five outcomes as one information-flow and governance foundation rather than as isolated experiments.

CORE 01

Organizational Knowledge Mining Core

Extract candidate actors, actions, objects, states, decisions, and outcomes from documents, free text, operational data, and logs, then convert validated candidates into reusable knowledge units.

CORE 02

Episode Memory Core

Accumulate situations, events, decisions, outcomes, evaluations, and sources as Episode Cards and retrieve related experience for reuse.

CORE 03

Process Mining Core

Transform structured logs and human-validated event candidates from unstructured information into models of actual workflows, exceptions, rework, and branching paths.

CORE 04

Operational World Model Layer

Provide a common schema and reference APIs linking document knowledge, concept nodes, episodes, processes, sources, and permissions for continuous updating.

CORE 05

Business Artifact Generator

Convert analytical outputs into drafts of operating manuals, process descriptions, case collections, decision rationales, and improvement candidates.

04

Core Workflow Enabled by the Completed System

1

Ingest documents, data, logs, and events from business systems, relational databases, files, and automation tools such as Zapier.

2

Preserve source information such as original text, record IDs, timestamps, authors, and system names for later verification.

3

Use LLMs as language-processing components to extract and normalize candidate actors, actions, objects, states, decisions, outcomes, reasons, and evaluations.

4

Allow human reviewers to validate candidates, correct errors, add evaluations, approve content, and define access scopes.

5

Generate knowledge pages, Episode Cards, event logs, and process descriptions from validated information.

6

Use ConceptMiner and Concept Index to form conceptual groupings, and process mining to identify actual flows, exceptions, rework, and branching paths.

7

Enable business users to work with the results as manuals, case collections, and process models, while AI agents retrieve relevant knowledge and experience through MCP or APIs.

8

Record new decisions and outcomes and continuously update the organization-specific knowledge, experience, and process models.

05

Minimum Scope of the Phase 1 Reference Implementation

The project does not promise fully autonomous agents or automated strategic decision-making. Priority will be given to completing an implementation foundation that participating companies can inspect and evaluate themselves.

Functional Area
Minimum Scope
Practical Significance
Information Ingestion
API and webhook input, CSV and JSON file input, and sample workflows for tools such as Zapier
Capture operational information without relying exclusively on manual entry
Source and Access Governance
Original-source references, record IDs, timestamps, authors, access scopes, and basic change history
Verify generated results and keep them under enterprise control
LLM Extraction and Normalization
Extract candidate actors, actions, objects, states, decisions, outcomes, and reasons and convert them to a common format
Turn fragmented natural-language information into an entry point for structuring
Knowledge-Page and Document Generation
Generate draft knowledge pages, operational descriptions, case summaries, and process explanations with links to source material
Produce artifacts usable by people who are not data analysts
Episode Card
Create, edit, and delete records of situations, events, decisions, outcomes, evaluations, sources, authors, and timestamps
Preserve experience as verifiable units rather than mere chat history
Process Mining
Event-log generation, basic process discovery, and visualization of frequency, paths, repetitions, and exceptions
Understand how work is actually performed rather than relying only on prescribed procedures
Concept Formation and Related-Information Discovery
Attribute search, semantic similarity, concept nodes, and conceptual segments
Discover groupings that emerge from the data, not only predefined classifications
Human Governance
Validation, correction, deletion, added evaluation, approval status, source reference, and basic change history
Keep enterprise knowledge under human governance rather than delegating it entirely to AI
MCP / API Access
Reference connections through which AI agents search and retrieve knowledge, episodes, concepts, and processes
Avoid lock-in to a specific LLM or agent
Evaluation and Deliverables
Reference code, execution environment, setup instructions, API specifications, sample data, and evaluation scenarios
Enable participating companies to conduct internal evaluations
06

Illustrative Use Cases

Quality and Maintenance

Information Ingested: Anomaly reports, equipment logs, causal hypotheses, responses, and recovery outcomes

Outputs Generated and Used: Similar-incident cards, effective and ineffective responses, deviations from standard procedures, and draft maintenance manuals

Research and Development

Information Ingested: Experimental conditions, design reviews, failures, decisions, outcomes, and next hypotheses

Outputs Generated and Used: Recall of failure cases, hypothesis lineage, conceptual clustering of conditions, and reconstruction of experimental records

Sales and Customer Service

Information Ingested: CRM records, sales-call notes, proposals, responses, and reasons for wins or losses

Outputs Generated and Used: Similar customers and opportunities, win-loss factors, response processes, and draft proposal and service playbooks

Manufacturing, Logistics, and Administrative Operations

Information Ingested: Work logs, application histories, emails, handoffs, and daily reports

Outputs Generated and Used: Actual workflows, rework, delays, duplication, process documentation, and improvement candidates

Management and New Business Development

Information Ingested: Meeting records, assumptions, options, decisions, execution outcomes, and evaluations

Outputs Generated and Used: Decision histories, consistency with past policies, outcomes of similar decisions, and collections of decision rationales

Skill and Knowledge Transfer

Information Ingested: Interviews with experienced personnel, scattered documents, cases, and tacit decision criteria

Outputs Generated and Used: LLM Wiki pages, business processes, case collections, records of exception handling, and training drafts

07

Why Enterprise AI Now Needs an Operational World Model

01

Large language models possess extensive general knowledge and language capabilities, but they do not preserve company-specific experience, decision criteria, or operational reality in a persistent and verifiable form.

02

RAG and vector search are useful for locating document fragments, but they cannot by themselves model decision histories or the sequences and branches through which work actually proceeds.

03

This project uses LLMs as standard components for extraction, summarization, verbalization, and dialogue. Its competitive focus is the mechanism that continuously turns enterprise observations into concepts, experience, and processes under human governance.

08

Avoiding the Mistakes of the KDD and Data-Mining Era

Even a useful discovery algorithm becomes difficult to use when the distance between its output and a practical business artifact is too great. This project includes the conversion from discovery into documents, processes, and cases within the product itself.

Design to Avoid
Design Adopted in This Project
Stop after displaying clusters or process maps
Generate drafts of knowledge pages, process descriptions, case collections, decision rationales, and improvement candidates
Require business users to interpret outputs without guidance
Provide industry- and function-specific templates, review items, and evaluation scenarios
Treat AI-generated content as established fact
Preserve original text, sources, change history, and approval status and require human validation
Depend on the skills of individual consultants
Productize the capability as common data models, reference implementations, APIs, and setup procedures
Evaluate through a one-time proof of concept
Evaluate a continuing cycle in which new events and outcomes update knowledge, experience, and process models
Success will be evaluated not by the number of advanced algorithms included, but by reuse of past experience, reduced documentation time, traceability of decision rationales, and improvement of operational processes.
09

Existing Implementation Foundation

This project does not begin from zero. Since April 2025, Mindware Research Institute has developed and validated the following technologies as working systems.

ThinkNavi / LLM Wiki

Implemented

Reconstructs documents as knowledge pages, routes questions to appropriate pages, and references source documents. Phase 1 will separate Single Wiki Builder and use it as the foundation for business-artifact generation.

ConceptMiner

Implemented

Applies Growing Neural Gas and a Minimum Spanning Tree to embedding space to form concept nodes and relationship structures.

Concept Index

In Development

Maps records in existing relational databases to concept nodes, enabling conceptual extraction through SQL and connecting operational data and episodes to the model.

CCM / Thinking Support

Implemented

An experimental environment for associative responses and decision support using relationships among concepts, episodes, and decision candidates.

10

Core Philosophy: A Self-Organizing Concept Approach

Grow concept structures from observed data instead of defining a fixed ontology first

Rules, objects, and ontologies are useful for system integration, regulatory compliance, and access control. However, predefined structures alone cannot cover new similarities, exceptions, ambiguous judgments, and organization-specific meanings. The project forms concept structures from actual data while people name and formalize only what must be fixed.

LLMCandidate extraction, summarization, documentation, and dialogue from natural language
ConceptMiner / Concept IndexForm concept nodes, segments, and relationship structures from similarity and relationships
Process MiningDerive actual flows, branches, repetitions, and exceptions from time-sequenced events
Human Validation and GovernanceSource verification, correction, approval, permissions, evaluation, and naming
11

Deliverables and Services for Participating Companies

Each participating company will receive the contractual foundation package regardless of participation scale. Twenty companies is not a launch condition; it is an expansion target for additional development and external review.

01

Organizational Knowledge Mining Core

Reference implementation covering information ingestion, source governance, LLM-generated extraction candidates, human validation, and generation of knowledge units and event candidates.

02

Episode Memory Core

Reference implementation including Episode Cards, related-case retrieval, API and webhook input, MCP and API access, and basic management functions.

03

Process Mining Core

Reference implementation including event-log generation, basic process discovery, visualization of paths, repetitions, and exceptions, and sample evaluation scenarios.

04

Operational World Model Specification

Common schema, API specifications, and sample data linking document knowledge, concepts, episodes, processes, sources, and permissions.

05

Single Wiki Builder

Participant-only source code extracted from ThinkNavi, including access to a restricted GitHub repository, setup instructions, and sample data.

06

Concept Index

Executable software and basic documentation for evaluating conceptual search. Supported operating systems, databases, and terms of use will be specified at delivery.

07

ThinkNavi / ConceptMiner Annual Usage Rights

Usage and evaluation rights for designated functions during Phase 1. API charges, processing scale, and usage scope will be defined in the participation terms.

08

Year-Round Online Program

Monthly sessions, technical demonstrations, development reports, an archive of recordings and materials, common-question support, and a final report.

There is no minimum launch threshold. The contracted foundation outcomes and minimum scope of each Core are planned regardless of participation scale.
12

Expansion According to Participation

The foundation deliverables and minimum scope of each Core are planned regardless of the number of participating companies.
Reaching 20 companies will serve as a benchmark for substantially expanding implementation, expert review, evaluation tools, and documentation.
Advanced reflection, memory consolidation, case-based strategic judgment, conformance checking, predictive process monitoring, additional connectors, and multi-agent sharing will be selected according to participation and technical validation.
Additional themes will be selected by the organizer as common technical issues rather than treated as ordinary one-company custom development requests.
Company-specific proofs of concept, integrations, data preparation, and customization will be contracted separately from the annual participation fee.
13

Phase 1 Development Schedule (Draft)

October-December 2026

Core Work: Participant interviews, common-use-case definition, information ingestion, and data-model design for sources, permissions, Episode Cards, and event candidates

Main Verifiable Outcomes: Registration and editing UI/API, extraction and validation flow, and initial demonstration

January-March 2027

Core Work: Related-case retrieval, event-log generation, basic process discovery, ConceptMiner and Concept Index integration, and MCP server/API access

Main Verifiable Outcomes: Knowledge and episode retrieval, process visualization, and AI-agent access demonstration

April-June 2027

Core Work: Single Wiki Builder integration; generation of operational documents, process descriptions, and case collections; participant evaluation scenarios

Main Verifiable Outcomes: Integrated demonstration of knowledge, concepts, episodes, and processes

July-September 2027

Core Work: Incorporation of evaluation results, refinement of permissions and change history, documentation, samples, final tagged release, and outcome report

Main Verifiable Outcomes: Reference implementation, technical materials, evaluation results, and final symposium

Detailed timing, feature priorities, and delivery methods will be adjusted according to technical validation and common value for participating companies.
14

Year-Round Online Program

Format
Program Content
Value to Participants
Monthly Sessions
Development progress, technical demonstrations, design decisions, and Q&A
Share the development process and design rationale, not only the completed system
Use-Case Review
Examine common operational information, evaluation methods, and implementation barriers across participants
Reflect practical requirements in common specifications without disclosing company-specific information
Thematic Lectures and Reviews
Lectures and reviews by relevant researchers, technical specialists, and practitioners
Validate the work from both research and practical perspectives
Materials Archive
Recordings, technical materials, evaluation procedures, and update history
Support internal sharing and ongoing evaluation
Final Report and Symposium
Reference implementation, architecture, known limitations, evaluation results, and future roadmap
Support decisions on internal adoption, additional proofs of concept, and participation in a future phase
15

Participation Terms and Project Positioning

Participation Fee, Excluding TaxJPY 2.5M

Up to two designated participants per unit

Multiple units permitted

Payment Terms

50% upon application and contract execution; the remaining 50% before the project begins.

No Minimum Launch Threshold

The project will not be canceled and fees will not be refunded solely because participation does not reach the expansion target. Contracted core outcomes will still be delivered.

Participant Confidentiality

Company names, logos, and participant names will remain confidential in principle. Prior consent will be obtained before disclosure.

Intellectual Property and Governance

Participation does not confer ownership interests in intellectual property, voting rights, exclusive rights, or authority over the product roadmap.

Permitted Use

Deliverables may be used for internal evaluation and research within the contractual scope. Redistribution and use in competing services will be prohibited.

Company-Specific Work

Company-specific proofs of concept, integrations, data preparation, customization, and production deployment support will require separate agreements.

Positioning of This ProjectThis is an early-participation, multi-client development program in which advance participation by multiple companies makes a common enterprise AI foundation possible. It is not a donation, an equity investment, or joint research based on shared intellectual-property ownership. It is a B2B development service providing defined deliverables, usage rights, and access to the development program.
16

Research Foundations and Primary Reference Candidates

The project does not promise to reproduce each theory faithfully or implement all of them during Phase 1. These are design references for translation into reference implementations that can be evaluated in enterprise environments.

01

LLM Wiki

Andrej Karpathy

Compile source material into reusable, cross-referenced knowledge pages rather than searching raw fragments directly.

02

Process Mining

Wil M. P. van der Aalst and others

Discover actual business processes from event logs and analyze deviations, bottlenecks, repetitions, and exceptions.

03

Generative Agents

Joon Sung Park and others

Store experience as natural-language memory, retrieve it by relevance, recency, and importance, and use it for reflection and planning.

04

Complementary Learning Systems

McClelland, McNaughton, and O’Reilly

Link rapid recording of new events with slower formation of general structures from accumulated experience.

05

Case-Based Reasoning

Aamodt and Plaza

Retrieve, reuse, revise, and retain past cases as a continuing problem-solving cycle.

06

KDD / Knowledge Discovery

Fayyad, Piatetsky-Shapiro, Smyth, and others

Critically extend the KDD process by converting analytical outputs into documents, processes, and cases usable by business personnel.

Hierarchical Memory / MemGPTGlobal WorkspaceSoar / ACT-RTolman-Eichenbaum MachineActive Inference
17

Project Director

President and Principal Researcher, Mindware Research Institute, Inc.Kunihiro Tada

Beginning in 1982, he was involved in planning and operating technical seminars on advanced technologies, including new media, at a publishing and seminar company. From 1985, he conducted business-opportunity research in advanced technology fields at a major consulting company. In 1986, he organized an AI Chip Seminar that included fuzzy inference chips. In 1997, he wrote a serialized article on Concept Research for a management magazine. In 1998, he began research focused on Kohonen’s Self-Organizing Map. From 2000, he served as the Japanese distributor for Viscovery SOMine and also handled HUGIN and XLSTAT. Following XLSTAT’s acquisition in 2023, he began developing proprietary systems and established the core ConceptMiner technology using Growing Neural Gas and a Minimum Spanning Tree.

Relevant researchers, technical specialists, and practitioners will be invited for thematic lectures and reviews.

Request the Phase 1 Information Package and Implementation Demo

Detailed schedules, contractual terms, advisors, and final usage conditions for the deliverables will be confirmed after formal approval. Inquiries regarding participation, briefings, and implementation demonstrations are welcome.